Thoughts on the Giants’ draft

| June 17, 2011

Old pal Tom Krasovic, a longtime Padres beat writer and one of my former FanHouse colleagues, has some comments on his blog from scouts about the draft. I’ve clipped out the stuff about the Giants:

“Their draft was sneaky good.”

On first-round pick Joe Panik, a shortstop from St. John’s:

“San Francisco was kind of vanilla in the first round with the St. John’s shortstop.”

“Panik, I thought, was a very under-rated player. Good-body middle infielder that ought to stay at shortstop. Should really hit. Gamer, just doesn’t have big tools. The throwing is average, the running is on the bubble, but he has instincts for the game. Baseball player pick.”

“I was a little suprised the Giants took the St. John’s guy in the first round, because he had labrum surgery as a freshman there. He is supposed to be a good player.”

“Panik is the kind of guy who has to overachieve.”

“Panik — definitely one of the better hitters in the draft. Not real quick twitch. I thought that was an extremely safe pick for the first round. We thought he was a guy who could stick at shortstop but probably would end up at second. He definitely can hit.”

And the scouts also had some comments about the Giants’ second-round pick, Oregon State catcher Andrew Susac…

“Susac, he’s going to be a feast or famine guy. Has pretty big power, has arm strength. Yet to be seen if he’s going to be a good catcher. It depends on if he wants to show up every day or not. Moody kid. Turned down $900,000 out of high school. ”

“Susac, this past year, it was almost a role reversal for him. He was more offense than defense. Has a lot of raw power. Has arm strength. To me, his catching has regressed, not from a physical standpoint, almost a mental standpoint.”

Some random thoughts to prove I’m alive

| June 15, 2011

Hey guys, it’s been a while. As I explained in that last post that had been sitting atop my blog for the past, oh, three weeks, I’m now the Editor of the Giants and A’s magazines, which doesn’t leave me as much time for blogging. But it does leave some — as I sit here and wait for things to edit — so here are a few things that have been kicking around in my head…

Realignment? Sure, what the hell

I personally don’t see the need for all this realignment talk. I like things the way are. So what if one league has two more teams and the AL West has only four teams, while the NL Central has six? Alas, if it’s going to happen, I am OK with the Astros moving to the AL West. It would create a nice little rivarly between the Astros and Rangers and it would make the trips easier for the three West Coast teams if they do a whole week in Texas.

The main problem, to many folks, of going to 15 teams in each league is that there would have to be at least one interleague series going at all times, which would take away some of the “excitement” over those games. Well, the excitement is gone already. Anyone really jacked up about seeing the Indians in San Francisco or the Marlins in Oakland this month? Yes, interleague games in September may be kinda weird for the pennant races, but there are already inter-division games in September, so what’s the big deal? The Giants hosted the Brewers last September. Is there any difference between that and the Giants-White Sox? Besides, I’ll bet the schedule-makers would be tricky enough to save the September interleague matchups for those that may not impact the pennant races (Royals-Pirates!).

(more…)