<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was Pablo Sandoval&#8217;s bunt OK?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://baybridgebaseball.com/2009/06/was-pablo-sandovals-bunt-ok/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://baybridgebaseball.com/2009/06/was-pablo-sandovals-bunt-ok/</link>
	<description>An A&#039;s-Giants blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:49:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Jensen</title>
		<link>http://baybridgebaseball.com/2009/06/was-pablo-sandovals-bunt-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-2879</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baybridgebaseball.com/?p=1128#comment-2879</guid>
		<description>I thought it was a smart baseball play.  The game was deadlocked, Mazzaro and Lincecum were both dealing, and he spotted an opportunity to get on base and laid down a very good bunt.

If it was the 8th or 9th you could start talking about ettiquette but not that early in the game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was a smart baseball play.  The game was deadlocked, Mazzaro and Lincecum were both dealing, and he spotted an opportunity to get on base and laid down a very good bunt.</p>
<p>If it was the 8th or 9th you could start talking about ettiquette but not that early in the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LAdodgerh8r</title>
		<link>http://baybridgebaseball.com/2009/06/was-pablo-sandovals-bunt-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-2869</link>
		<dc:creator>LAdodgerh8r</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baybridgebaseball.com/?p=1128#comment-2869</guid>
		<description>Louie K, sorry dude ... but that was not a puss move. It was the fifth inning, hardly anywhere close to being a no-hitter, so I give Sandoval kudos for doing something to get his team going. If it was the 7th or something, and that happened, ok, maybe then I can see your point. But not when it&#039;s a close game in the fifth.That aside, the A&#039;s didn&#039;t seem to have a problem with it, only the A&#039;s fans ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louie K, sorry dude &#8230; but that was not a puss move. It was the fifth inning, hardly anywhere close to being a no-hitter, so I give Sandoval kudos for doing something to get his team going. If it was the 7th or something, and that happened, ok, maybe then I can see your point. But not when it&#8217;s a close game in the fifth.That aside, the A&#8217;s didn&#8217;t seem to have a problem with it, only the A&#8217;s fans &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louie K</title>
		<link>http://baybridgebaseball.com/2009/06/was-pablo-sandovals-bunt-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-2868</link>
		<dc:creator>Louie K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baybridgebaseball.com/?p=1128#comment-2868</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but that was a total puss move by Sando. Zero Zero, cmon now be a man. They should have drilled his keester the next time he was up....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but that was a total puss move by Sando. Zero Zero, cmon now be a man. They should have drilled his keester the next time he was up&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave S.</title>
		<link>http://baybridgebaseball.com/2009/06/was-pablo-sandovals-bunt-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-2859</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baybridgebaseball.com/?p=1128#comment-2859</guid>
		<description>Jeff, I thought that this was a head&#039;s up play by Sandoval, and I saw absolutely nothing wrong with it, especially in what was at the time a close one run game and situation. This illustrates why Sandoval is batting over .300. I wish he would show Burriss and Lewis how to bunt more and maybe then they would not slump so badly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, I thought that this was a head&#8217;s up play by Sandoval, and I saw absolutely nothing wrong with it, especially in what was at the time a close one run game and situation. This illustrates why Sandoval is batting over .300. I wish he would show Burriss and Lewis how to bunt more and maybe then they would not slump so badly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Augustus</title>
		<link>http://baybridgebaseball.com/2009/06/was-pablo-sandovals-bunt-ok/comment-page-1/#comment-2858</link>
		<dc:creator>Augustus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 17:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baybridgebaseball.com/?p=1128#comment-2858</guid>
		<description>Shouldn&#039;t the connective be &quot;and&quot;?  late in the game AND game not close AND batter rarely a bunter for a hit.  In a one-run game, say, no etiquette ought to apply, since it&#039;s the batter&#039;s job and duty to get on base for his team to have a chance to win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t the connective be &#8220;and&#8221;?  late in the game AND game not close AND batter rarely a bunter for a hit.  In a one-run game, say, no etiquette ought to apply, since it&#8217;s the batter&#8217;s job and duty to get on base for his team to have a chance to win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

