<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparing the Moneyball scripts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://baybridgebaseball.com/2009/06/comparing-the-moneyball-scripts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://baybridgebaseball.com/2009/06/comparing-the-moneyball-scripts/</link>
	<description>An A&#039;s-Giants blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:49:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoneyballMovie</title>
		<link>http://baybridgebaseball.com/2009/06/comparing-the-moneyball-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-2930</link>
		<dc:creator>MoneyballMovie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baybridgebaseball.com/?p=1174#comment-2930</guid>
		<description>Great comparison, great post.  

Here&#039;s the breaker for me between the two scripts.  In Zillian&#039;s, Jeremy Giambi is always watching the Natural on DVD.  In Soderbergh&#039;s, he watches Happy Gilmore.  That sums it up for me.  

Even if the facts aren&#039;t true, I rather watch the first movie with Brad Pitt trading players and women at about the same pace.  It&#039;s Hollywood, not Oakland.  The second script is much more Oakland.

Either way, I hope the movie gets made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comparison, great post.  </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the breaker for me between the two scripts.  In Zillian&#8217;s, Jeremy Giambi is always watching the Natural on DVD.  In Soderbergh&#8217;s, he watches Happy Gilmore.  That sums it up for me.  </p>
<p>Even if the facts aren&#8217;t true, I rather watch the first movie with Brad Pitt trading players and women at about the same pace.  It&#8217;s Hollywood, not Oakland.  The second script is much more Oakland.</p>
<p>Either way, I hope the movie gets made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Jensen</title>
		<link>http://baybridgebaseball.com/2009/06/comparing-the-moneyball-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-2929</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baybridgebaseball.com/?p=1174#comment-2929</guid>
		<description>I think with some rewrites the original script could be made into something a little more historically accurate and still entertaining.  The Soderbergh script sounds pretty dull even if accurate to the events.  Its pretty much impossible not to have some dramatic license when working from real life because real life generally isn&#039;t that interesting.  The whole thing with Beane and the waitresses and revolving girlfriends isn&#039;t important to the story and could be taken out.  There are ways they could better incorporate DePodesta into the story than the contrived meeting with Shapiro.

The stuff with David Justice and Scott Hatteberg is interesting, especially Hatteberg because its a story a lot of people can relate to on a human level even if they&#039;ve never played baseball.  The thing I thought that really tied the book together was Beane the GM understanding that Beane the player and others like him had no business being major leaguers regardless of physical talent and that in this regard the traditional scouting culture was failing.  I think that they could expand that stuff and keep it interesting for a wider audience, especially since its a human story as much as a baseball story.

I think they could go back a little further to the decline of the great late 80&#039;s teams and the recollection of A&#039;s management of what needed to be done and maybe spend a few minutes of screen time on that to lead up to how the Moneyball culture in Oakland came about and its current most successful incarnation in the late 90&#039;s early 00&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think with some rewrites the original script could be made into something a little more historically accurate and still entertaining.  The Soderbergh script sounds pretty dull even if accurate to the events.  Its pretty much impossible not to have some dramatic license when working from real life because real life generally isn&#8217;t that interesting.  The whole thing with Beane and the waitresses and revolving girlfriends isn&#8217;t important to the story and could be taken out.  There are ways they could better incorporate DePodesta into the story than the contrived meeting with Shapiro.</p>
<p>The stuff with David Justice and Scott Hatteberg is interesting, especially Hatteberg because its a story a lot of people can relate to on a human level even if they&#8217;ve never played baseball.  The thing I thought that really tied the book together was Beane the GM understanding that Beane the player and others like him had no business being major leaguers regardless of physical talent and that in this regard the traditional scouting culture was failing.  I think that they could expand that stuff and keep it interesting for a wider audience, especially since its a human story as much as a baseball story.</p>
<p>I think they could go back a little further to the decline of the great late 80&#8242;s teams and the recollection of A&#8217;s management of what needed to be done and maybe spend a few minutes of screen time on that to lead up to how the Moneyball culture in Oakland came about and its current most successful incarnation in the late 90&#8242;s early 00&#8242;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://baybridgebaseball.com/2009/06/comparing-the-moneyball-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-2928</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baybridgebaseball.com/?p=1174#comment-2928</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to watch this as a baseball fan when it comes out, but it is helpful to know the facts that you just laid out because I would have accepted the way that they portray DePodesta, etc. If I wasn&#039;t a baseball fan, I&#039;m not sure how interested I&#039;d be in seeing a movie like this if it was portrayed accurately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to watch this as a baseball fan when it comes out, but it is helpful to know the facts that you just laid out because I would have accepted the way that they portray DePodesta, etc. If I wasn&#8217;t a baseball fan, I&#8217;m not sure how interested I&#8217;d be in seeing a movie like this if it was portrayed accurately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bay Area Sports Blog &#187; C&#38;E: June 28</title>
		<link>http://baybridgebaseball.com/2009/06/comparing-the-moneyball-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-2927</link>
		<dc:creator>Bay Area Sports Blog &#187; C&#38;E: June 28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baybridgebaseball.com/?p=1174#comment-2927</guid>
		<description>[...] Scripts – Jeff Fletcher breaks down the two Moneyball scripts. Steve Zaillian’s is fascinating but factually inaccurate. Steven Soderbergh’s is factually [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scripts – Jeff Fletcher breaks down the two Moneyball scripts. Steve Zaillian’s is fascinating but factually inaccurate. Steven Soderbergh’s is factually [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

