<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brian Wilson and Twitter-gate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://baybridgebaseball.com/2009/04/brian-wilson-and-twitter-gate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://baybridgebaseball.com/2009/04/brian-wilson-and-twitter-gate/</link>
	<description>An A's-Giants blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:23:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://baybridgebaseball.com/2009/04/brian-wilson-and-twitter-gate/comment-page-1/#comment-2745</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baybridgebaseball.com/?p=1007#comment-2745</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to stand by what I said here.  From Schulman&#039;s article:
&quot;Somebody alerted me to Wilson&#039;s Twitter page. Unless somebody hijacked the page, we have to conclude the Giants&#039; closer was out very late Saturday night clubbing in Scottsdale.&quot;

So you&#039;re right that the fans alerted him to the Twitter page.  Schulman does speculate that Wilson was out late clubbing, though.  I read Wilson&#039;s twitter, and I do not agree that &quot;we have to conclude the Giants&#039; closer was out very late Saturday night clubbing in Scottsdale.&quot;

If fans were speculating about it I can see why Schulman wanted to address it, I just think the kind of speculation he offered was inappropriate.  I&#039;m not a journalist myself so I&#039;m not going to offer an opinion on how it should have been reported, I just feel it should have left out the speculation on Schulman&#039;s part.

Thanks for giving us another journalist&#039;s point of view!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to stand by what I said here.  From Schulman&#8217;s article:<br />
&#8220;Somebody alerted me to Wilson&#8217;s Twitter page. Unless somebody hijacked the page, we have to conclude the Giants&#8217; closer was out very late Saturday night clubbing in Scottsdale.&#8221;</p>
<p>So you&#8217;re right that the fans alerted him to the Twitter page.  Schulman does speculate that Wilson was out late clubbing, though.  I read Wilson&#8217;s twitter, and I do not agree that &#8220;we have to conclude the Giants&#8217; closer was out very late Saturday night clubbing in Scottsdale.&#8221;</p>
<p>If fans were speculating about it I can see why Schulman wanted to address it, I just think the kind of speculation he offered was inappropriate.  I&#8217;m not a journalist myself so I&#8217;m not going to offer an opinion on how it should have been reported, I just feel it should have left out the speculation on Schulman&#8217;s part.</p>
<p>Thanks for giving us another journalist&#8217;s point of view!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Fletcher</title>
		<link>http://baybridgebaseball.com/2009/04/brian-wilson-and-twitter-gate/comment-page-1/#comment-2741</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Fletcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baybridgebaseball.com/?p=1007#comment-2741</guid>
		<description>I disagree with you on that one B. Fans were noticing Wilson&#039;s Tweets and commenting about it before it got to Schulman. It was the fans who alerted him, actually. If the public is already talking about something, a reporter can&#039;t simply ignore it. I believe in his original post, he said he wasn&#039;t accusing Wilson of being out late or of not being prepared to pitch. He was simply saying: &quot;Wilson wrote something on Twitter and this is what the fans think about it.&quot; Period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with you on that one B. Fans were noticing Wilson&#8217;s Tweets and commenting about it before it got to Schulman. It was the fans who alerted him, actually. If the public is already talking about something, a reporter can&#8217;t simply ignore it. I believe in his original post, he said he wasn&#8217;t accusing Wilson of being out late or of not being prepared to pitch. He was simply saying: &#8220;Wilson wrote something on Twitter and this is what the fans think about it.&#8221; Period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B</title>
		<link>http://baybridgebaseball.com/2009/04/brian-wilson-and-twitter-gate/comment-page-1/#comment-2740</link>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baybridgebaseball.com/?p=1007#comment-2740</guid>
		<description>I think the real problem was Schulman&#039;s article about the &quot;event&quot; (which was what alerted Giants fans to it in the first place) made big assumptions and made the situation out to be something it wasn&#039;t.  I&#039;m not a huge Wilson fan, but he got a bad break in this.  That said I agree with you he needs to understand as a public figure everything he does in a public forum is open to judgement, I just wouldn&#039;t expect a respectable journalist to be leading the wild speculation...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the real problem was Schulman&#8217;s article about the &#8220;event&#8221; (which was what alerted Giants fans to it in the first place) made big assumptions and made the situation out to be something it wasn&#8217;t.  I&#8217;m not a huge Wilson fan, but he got a bad break in this.  That said I agree with you he needs to understand as a public figure everything he does in a public forum is open to judgement, I just wouldn&#8217;t expect a respectable journalist to be leading the wild speculation&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
